Connect with us

Thought Leadership

OPINION: Social Media and the Role of Election Management Bodies



Social media refers to the use of web-based mobile digital technologies to turn communication into highly interactive dialogue, and covers blogs and microblogs such as Twitter, content communities such as YouTube, social networking sites like Facebook and (cell-based) cross-platform instant messaging applications like WhatsApp Messenger.

During the past fifteen years, social media has changed every facet of communications; significant amount of information and communications work has migrated from conventional media platforms (print and electronic media) to digital social networks. Dynamic organisations and businesses have already tapped into the massive opportunities in digital media, and particularly, social media.

The Government of Uganda approved a Government Communication Strategy (2012) which guides ministries, departments and agencies (MDAs) on use social media to communicate government policies, programmes and activities. New (social) media is considered by Government as an effective platform in facilitating implementation of constitutional provisions relating to right of access to information.

To support the above, Uganda Communications Commission and sister regulatory authorities have formulated necessary (regulatory) framework to guide the use of new media, which helps service providers and users to curb potential excesses of digital technologies.

As a modern and progressive institution, the Electoral Commission has taken deliberate steps to integrate digital technologies in our organizational information and communication structure.

The Department of Public Relations and the Department of Information Technology have been particularly positioned to provide leadership in this integration, with satisfactory results.

The Commission has further provided for training of all field election officials with knowledge and skills to utilize social media in the course of their duties.

Electoral Commission Social Media Strategy

In 2015, the Electoral Commission adopted a social media strategy to guide the institution in utilizing new digital technologies and social media to reach increasing diverse audience, as outlined in the following indicators:

The official EC Twitter account @UgandaEC was activated and a hashtag #AskEC2016, became a channel for the voters to ask questions and raise concerns, a forum where queries about the electoral process could be addressed;

Justice Byabakama Mugenyi Simon, Chairperson, Electoral Commission speaking at the launch of a media campaign on polling stations reorganisation. He said the Commission would adopt new media technologies such as social media to carry out voter education especially amongst the youth.

The Facebook page Electoral Commission Uganda was activated and gained followers who used the platform to raise inquiries and received responses. The Commission used the platform to post updates on the electoral process;

The Commission created a Whatsapp group (EC Media Center) for media personnel accredited to cover the 2016 General Elections. The platform facilitated timely updates on the electoral process, as well as prompt responses to press inquiries, and provision of necessary clarification and guidance;

The Commission hosts a functional website where information related to the electoral process (statistics, press releases and guidelines), administrative (jobs) and logistics matters (tenders), can be easily accessed by various stakeholders;  

The National Voters’ Register was uploaded on the website to facilitate easy  access for voters who have access to the internet using either smartphone or a desk top. The benefits of this innovation include online checking of (individual) voter’s registration status; availability of the Register for verification by interested stakeholders (parties, etc); free access to the Register hence saving costs on the part of stakeholders; increased voter/stakeholder participation in the cleaning process; and, enhanced transparency in the electoral process.

During the 2016 General Elections, the Commission used SMS to inform voters about their voting status and their respective polling stations. This was achieved by broadcasting the voters’ voting details for voters who had indicated their telephone numbers during the National ID registration exercise. The SMS service also enabled registered voters confirm the details of their polling stations from a mobile phone by texting his/her voter Id number to code 8228 to get a confirmation message of their registration status;

The Electoral Commission regional and district offices have been connected to the internet to enable use of web-based platforms for information and communication and stakeholder engagement;

This social media strategy was designed to particularly achieve the following:

Increase brand awareness among stakeholders, especially the youth and working middle class who often show little enthusiasm for electoral issues. Hence the Commission has adopted social media in order to reach this critical audience and interest them in participating in electoral activites;

Improve engagement with a wide range of stakeholders (political actors, the electorate, media, civil society, e.t.c), and a global audience that follows democracy, elections and governance issues in Uganda;

Engage audiences in real time and receive instant feedback on issues in the field during the electoral period. This enables the Commission to respond and manage issues and crisis;

Achieve sustainable, extensive publicity, sensitisation and stakeholder engagement at a fairly low cost. Social media is relatively inexpensive and accessible and enables cheap publishing and affordable access to information. This is critical as the Commission has  limited budget for communication and information dissemination;

Facilitate the conduct of peaceful campaigns by following candidates and supporters conduct, and correctly guiding on processes. The Commission is able to swiftly respond to complaints by candidates, agents and supporters;

Achieve an informed mass of stakeholders and a supportive electorate through promoting mass awareness on the electoral process;

Help in maintaining constitutional order in Uganda, through continuous stakeholder engagement before, during and after elections;

The role of the Election Management Body (EMB) in the social media matrix

Today, social media networks are a proven medium for enhancing and protecting brand reputation, improving customer service and managing crisis. These are postive aspects which EMBs critically need. In order to harness the power of social media, the Electoral Commission has observed and taken the following critical actions:

Hosting and maintaining updated, active and extensive online platforms, because this is where critical information, communication and regular stakeholder engagement has gone;

Being proactive in generating content and disseminating the same through the official social media accounts. It is a common practice for social media enthusiasts to cross-check facts against official accounts to verify the information before onward sharing. The EMB must be able to tell its story, and set the agenda for further discussion on the issue;

Training and equipping a dedicated communications team to manage the official social media platforms. This will ensure timely content generation, timely detection and interception of wrong information (fake news) and enable prompt dissemination of clarification where there is misunderstanding;

Partnering with relevant regulatory agencies (Media Council and Uganda Communications Commission) to develop regulations for responsible use of social media during elections. It is important to enhance awareness among media practitioners on their rights, roles and duties during the electoral process through an activity-specific code of conduct;

Challenges and Risks in the Use of Social Media by the Electoral Commission

While social media offers immense opportunities to EMBs to engage with their audiences and achieve wide range of benefits, the following limitations and risks need to be considered and managed:

Social networks are a proven medium for enhancing and protecting brand reputation, improving customer service and managing crisis. But they also have great potential for causing extensive damage and propagating falsehood (fake news), stirring controversy and igniting violence. EMBs, therefore, need to build capacity to mitigate the negative forces of social media.

New digital technologies have empowered the public to play an active role in the process of collecting, reporting, analyzing and disseminating news and information (also known as citizen journalism), with both positive and negative results. Social media has been used to disseminate wrong information about electoral processes, with the potential of sparking discontent and fuelling violence. In some cases, including Uganda (2016), governments have taken a decision to block access to social media. While such action helps to prevent escalation of tension and chaos, it has been criticised as violation of constitutional freedoms, mainly the right of access to information. Preventive actions by government and regulators have an effect on the final judgment of the overall conduct of the election.

Social media communication is characterised by anonymity, which compromises the authenticity of online communication and engagement. Social media is vulnerable to abuse and EMBs are often victims of pseudo accounts, which can mislead audiences, spark violence and damage institutional and national reputation;

Effective social media use requires extensive network coverage across Uganda; while phone and internet usage has been on the rise since 2000, the entire country is not covered. According to the Uganda Communication Sector Performance Report (June 2018) mobile phone access in Uganda stands at 56.1% while internet penetration is at 47.7%. Despite its immense influence, social media has limited access and use, and may not provide the ultimate solution to our information and communication needs.

It is observed that social media users always refer to national radio and television broadcasters to confirm the accuracy of information received. Hence, radio, television and the newspaper, remain trusted sources for accurate information, and should not be sidelined during planning and budgeting process.


This workshop provides a useful platform to share valuable knowledge and skills that will contribute to the improvement of our election management function through proven practices in strategic planning and effective communication through the use of social media.

It is evident that in order to maintain and increase positive brand visibility, EMBs need to embrace the changing media environment, and adopt policies and systems that facilitate integration of new media in the communications function and overall operations system.

We need to build the capacity of election management bodies to exploit the immense, fast and extensive power of social media. The irreversible growth of social networks has created a training need for organisations, and funds have to be provided to train and equip officials in web-based communication in order (for institutions) to make the best out of social media.

The author is the Spokesperson of Electoral Commission.

Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *


Bank of Africa’s Arthur Isiko on the bank’s quest to transform Ugandan SMEs and the future of banking

Arthur Isiko (FCCA), is a seasoned banker who has spent 17 years in banking at BANK OF AFRICA’s Uganda country operation. He joined the Bank in 2003 from PricewaterhouseCoopers as an Audit Manager and rose to become the Head of Finance, a role he served in for 6 years. In April 2010, he was appointed the Bank’s Executive Director and later became Managing Director in October 2015. He holds a Bachelor of Commerce degree in Accounting from Makerere University and an MBA from the University of Warwick.

Since taking on the role, the Bank has steadily grown its total asset book by 64% from UGX 498billion in 2014 to UGX 815billion by end of 2018. There has also been a notable turn around in profitability from UGX 1billion in 2014 to double digit figures of each of the last three years with 2018 at UGX 12.6 billion.

CEO EA Magazine, caught up with Mr Isiko on a number of insights about Bank of Africa, the banking industry and several other issues.



Who is Bank of Africa?

Bank of Africa started its operations in Uganda in January 1985 as small deposit-taking private company within a family conglomerate. In July 1991, it evolved into an investment bank. By November 1996, it was granted a commercial banking license as Sembule Commercial Bank. In October 1997, the shareholders of the Bank successfully secured co-investors in the form of Banque Belgolaise of Belgium (the part of Fortis Group), and the Netherlands Development Finance Company (FMO) who recapitalized the Bank and re-branded it Allied Bank International. It was run under this arrangement until December 2006 when Banque Belgolaise divested its ownership to Bank of Africa Group SA, an international banking consortium. The change in ownership was accompanied by a change in name to Bank of Africa – Uganda Ltd. With acquisition of a controlling stake in Bank of Africa Group SA by BMCE Bank in 2010, BMCE Bank of Africa became the ultimate holding company of the Bank.

BMCE Bank of Africa is present on four continents in 32 countries, 21 of which are in Africa, 8 in Europe, 1 in North America, and 2 in Asia. It operates with a total asset base of USD 30 billion and over 15,000 employees. In East Africa, the Group is present in Tanzania, Kenya, Burundi, Rwanda, and DRC.  We also have a representative office in Ethiopia.

In Uganda, we operate 34 branches that are well spread across the country. Over the last 5 years, we have enjoyed a healthy growth – roughly a cumulative annual growth rate of about 17% in total assets, customer deposits, and credit.  

What in your view do you think differentiates BANK OF AFRICA from the rest?

First, our heritage allows us to have multi-cultural DNA which allows us to fuse local market knowhow with international best practice Group strengths as we deliver effective financial solutions to our clientele.

Arthur Isiko has been at the centre of driving the bank’s cumulative annual growth rate of about 17% over the last 5 years. This is more than three times the 5% per annum economic growth rate and above the 10% average banking industry annual growth rate.

Second, we have been successful in significantly contributing to Uganda’s economic development through major interventions especially in the education, construction and trade sectors. Today, BOA in Uganda finances roughly 10% of the total credit to the education, construction and trade sectors, which is above the equilibrium 4% market share in a 24 bank market.

We are the go to financial solutions provider of many of the largest and medium-sized construction companies in Uganda and we are helping them grow and be able to finance many of the large contracts that you see in Uganda.

We are extremely passionate about the education sector in Uganda. Financing quality hard and soft infrastructure in the education sector and supporting the players in the sector to run their institutions more efficiently and profitably, to us, is much more than just business, it is about contributing to the growth of our economy. Quality education raises our young population’s productivity, improves innovation and creativity and boosts entrepreneurship, all of which are key drivers of economic growth and eventually development. 

What would you say are some of the bank’s biggest milestones in the last 5 years?

Being able to transform ourselves from a bank that was struggling with profitability to a highly profitable bank, with a cumulative annual growth rate of about 17% over the last 5 years is probably our biggest achievement. This is especially important in light of the growth rate of the Ugandan economy that has averaged 5% per annum and the average banking industry annual growth rate of 10% in the same period. Tripling the average economic growth rate and almost doubling banking industry growth is a significant achievement for us.

Secondly, we were the first bank to introduce the Mobile Wallet into this market. Obviously, mobile banking has now been adopted by many other financial institutions but I am proud to say that we were the first movers in that channel and our mobile banking solution today still provides a very significant competitive advantage in the market. When you compare what our wallet offers versus what other wallets offer, we still have a compelling solution.

PERFORMANCE WITH A PURPOSE: Isiko says that BOA has successfully and significantly contributed to Uganda’s economic development through major interventions especially in the education, construction and trade sectors. Today, BOA in Uganda finances roughly 10% of the total credit to the education, construction and trade sectors, which is above the equilibrium 4% market share in a 24 bank market.

Thirdly, we have grown our footprint. 15 years ago we only had 3 branches while today we have 34 branches and a growing number of agent locations across the country. Though we have expanded our brick and mortar channels we have also introduced a considerable number of alternative channels, thus providing improved access and flexibility to banking service.

You mentioned that BOA is passionate about the growth of the Ugandan economy. SMEs are a critical building block of this economy and yet are starved of credit. What solutions does BOA have for SMEs?

SMEs are an integral part of our business strategy. I did mention earlier that as a business, we are passionate about construction, education and trade sectors and many players in these sectors are SMEs. Today we have over 70,000 SMEs that we bank and SMEs contribute roughly 20% to our assets, liabilities and revenue. In fact, for the next 3 years, our primary focus will be to further increase our intervention in this segment. We anticipate that the SME contribution to our business will exceed 30% in two years.  

Our SME strategy lies in understanding the challenges that they face and customising solutions for the sector while eventually ushering them into the formal sector. For example many SMEs face challenges with being able to put up sufficient collateral. But today BOA has products and services that do not necessarily require collateral. 

It is also true that many SMEs do not keep formal or audited financial records, but we have evolved solutions that allow us to work with the SMEs to understand their cash flows, so we can be able to support their needs while providing affordable financing and operational solutions necessary for their growth. 

Are you looking at the budding oil and gas sector as well?

The oil and gas sector is going to be a very significant sector in Uganda over the next many decades, so we cannot avoid it. But again much of our contribution is going to be around supporting SMEs that are already involved in or want to be involved in the sector.

Digital banking is upon us, how prepared is BANK OF AFRICA? 

The future of banking is in mobility. Consumer preferences and industry innovations are all increasingly moving towards bank-as-you-go or 24/7 banking. Customers are increasingly opting for financial service availability whenever and wherever they want.

As a bank, it is critical and it is part of our focus and vision to anticipate these needs and be the bank that responds to them. We started the bank-led Mobile Wallet proposition in Uganda and today the industry has wallets, agent banking, and internet banking all channels aimed at driving convenience for the customer. There will be multiple options, for the public out there and obviously with those options comes the flexibility that the client is looking for.

PASSIONATE ABOUT SMES: Isiko says that SMEs are an integral part of BOA’ business strategy. The bank, currently banks over 70,000 SMEs which form about 20% of the bank’s business portfolio. His desire is to accelerate this to over 30% over the next 2-3 years. He says that the bank’s SME strategy, lies in understanding the challenges that they face and customising solutions for the sector with a view to eventually transform them into the formal sector.   

That said, brick and mortar banking is not entirely going away, but rather its use will change. In the future, as the premium on mobility increases, we hope to see a transformation in the use of banking halls from simply transactional locations to service centres, where customers come to obtain financial advice and discuss growth prospects of their businesses and plans, rather than undertake basic transactions.

Can you tell me roughly how cheaper an agent is compared to a brick & mortar branch?

Over the last five years the cost of operation in the banking sector has averaged anywhere between 7% to 9% per annum of bank total assets. Half of that cost is apportioned to payroll related costs. As more and more basic transactions go to the agent network and electronic channels, eventually these payroll costs will significantly reduce. If you consider other brick and mortar related costs such as branch rent and utilities, the cost savings arising from alternate channels such as agent banking becomes quite significant. These savings are expected to be passed on to the customer.

So can we say that as agent banking and other forms of digital banking take root, we should warm up to affordable lending?

I think yes.

We need to understand why lending rates are as high as they are and I can offer two basic reasons; the first is the expected return from those investing in offering financial services and the other is the cost of providing the service.

Starting with the expectations of those investing in financial services, today an investor in financial services has two options to generate returns, lend to the private sector and get a return at a certain risk or lend to government the biggest borrower in our markets today through participation in government paper auctions.

THE KINGFISHER OIL & DEVELOPMENT PROJECT IN THE ALBERTINE GRABEN: Isiko says that much as the oil and gas sector is going to be a very significant sector in Uganda over the next many decades- much of BOA’s sector interventions will be focused on supporting that are already involved in or want to be involved in the sector.  

In fact if you closely examine private sector financing many African countries, private sector credit comprises just about 20% of GDP, compared to developed countries such as the US where it is 180% of GDP or UK and China where it is 140%.  There is just a handful of African countries where private sector credit is above 50% of GDP such as Morocco (80%) and South Africa (about 65%).

So for example today in Uganda, the interest rate on a three to five year bond averages at about 14%. An offshore investor would consider such pricing and account for potential foreign currency fluctuations, typically, a potential Shilling annual devaluation of 5% based on long term Shilling past behaviour. Logically therefore, such an investor should expect a typical Ugandan investment return of 19%.   Consequently, it would be illogical for such an investor to consider lending to the private sector at less than 19%. 

On the operating cost argument, as I have mentioned to you, the average cost of operation in any financial institution ranges roughly between 7% to 9% of a bank’s total assets. So if a cost of operation of 9% is taken together with an average cost of funds in the market of between 3% to 5% and another 2% to 3% as cost of risk, even before accounting for investment profit margins, you have a minimum funding cost of 17%. So hoping for average lending rates below this is a stretch, unless something is done about the cost of operation.

DIGITAL BANKING & BIG DATA, THE NEXT BIG THING IN BANKING: Isiko believes that with consumer preferences and industry innovations, all increasingly moving towards bank-as-you-go or 24/7 banking, the future of banking is in mobility. He adds that the premium on mobility is going to continue defining almost everything that financial institutions do and deliver. He also says that the increasing shift to digital banking, presents countless opportunities for leveraging big data to segment, target and position solutions to address the needs of potential and existing customers and that BOA’s focus and vision was being invested in anticipating these customer needs and being the bank that responds to them.   

That is why as a banking industry, one of the approaches we have considered is to take a look at the biggest cost centre which is the cost of operation and introduce mechanisms to reduce this cost such as agent banking. If we can bring down the cost to about 4-5%, we will immediately see that translate into a similar reduction in the cost of borrowing. 

The Ugandan banking industry is top heavy; 5 out of 24 banks control 61% of bank assets and 74% of profitability. Don’t you think Uganda is overbanked? Do you believe there is a case for fewer banks that will benefit from economies of scale, lower their costs and pass on these benefits to customers in form of lower interest rates?

I do not think so.

Today, if I take our 24 banks which are now going to become 26 with the two new entrants, compared to our population, which is about 40 million people that would compute to roughly 1.4 million people per bank.

If I just take that as a statistic and compare with other countries, Kenya, Tanzania, South Africa, and the UK are at about 1.6 million people per bank. So from that simple statistic, numerically we are not necessarily overbanked.

So the problem then is different, the problem is infrastructural and access to the under banked or unbanked. It is still difficult for financial service providers to deliver service to the informal sector in a cost-meaningful way. That is why you have a scenario where in a population of 40 million people, out of which 14 million is the labour force, there are only 9 million bank accounts but 22 million mobile money wallet subscribers.

That tells you that there is an under-banked population that still requires formal financial services.

Over the last 10 years, we have seen several Ugandan executives rise up to become CEOs of multinationals in various sectors including banks. In your assessment, do you feel we have arrived or are we still lacking in some areas?

Over the last couple of years, we have actually increased the executive expertise that we have as Ugandans. Our educational levels are higher and international industry exposure and experience for many of the executives in this market has also grown. So yes, the crop of people who are available to run institutions and entities in the country has increased, but that is not to say that we are at optimal capacity.

Arthur Isiko (centre) speaks at the April 2018 launch of the Shared Agent Baking System by Uganda Bankers Association (UBA). According to Isiko, the countrywide inter-operable agent network and agent banking platform that connects all Uganda Bankers Association member banks across the country is the industry real attempt at reducing the cost of operation, which will in due course translate into reduced cost of lending. He says if by reducing the overheads associated with brick and mortar banking the costs of operation can be brought down to about 4-5%, the market will immediately see that translate into a similar reduction in the cost of borrowing. 

It also does not in its entirety necessarily explain why there is an increase in local executives. There is another factor that is completely ultra vires of what is happening in Uganda and that is the growth of companies and the middle class in Asia. The explosion of the middle class and successful companies in China, India and in most of the Asian tigers is quite significant that the expatriate requirements there have actually increased and as such, a transfer of executive expatriate service to Asia has gradually resulted into reductions in supply in Africa.   

Furthermore, while there has been an exponential increase in the quality of talent, multinationals also realise that there are cultural issues that expatriate staff need to deal with coupled with the high costs related to managing expatriate staff. Typically if you do a comparison of local versus expatriate recruitment, typically a local resource would be 2 to 3 times cheaper than an expatriate resource. So that has been significant motivation for the multinationals to consider local talent.

When you look ahead in the next 5-10 years, what would you say are the major trends that are going to shape the financial services industry and how are you positioning BOA to exploit or be at the forefront of those trends?

As I mentioned earlier, the premium on mobility is going to continue defining what many financial institutions do. And it is not just what we are doing today but in almost everything that we deliver. It is going to be a requirement to deliver service in a way that is providing a lot of flexibility to the customer.

Today, financial institutions are blessed with big data. If there is any sector in Uganda that has opportunity to use big data, it is the financial services industry. I believe this data will shape how we segment, target and position solutions to address the needs of our potential and existing customer base.

Another trend is the growth of social media which has brought a serious public attention deficit. I will not call it a disorder yet but it is a serious attention problem. To get attention from the public, today is extremely hard, far much harder than it was 10 years ago, as focus tends towards what is more exciting and attention grabbing.

Knowledge sharing to create the kind of information symmetry that is required for financial services to be effective is going to require extremely directed communication that relies on big data and therefore financial institutions that are extremely savvy with the way they handle big data are going to really succeed.

Continue Reading

Big Story

Digital Tax Stamps will increase revenue for both gov’t and legitimate businesses; only those with something to hide should be worried

Recent studies conducted by the tobacco and the alcohol industry show that if we, using Digital Tax Stamps and the recent ban on sachet alcohol, can eliminate 50% on smuggling and counterfeiting, we will be able to create new markets in excess of UGX615 billion for the two industries and over UGX180 billion in tax revenue.



Uganda Revenue Authority (URA) has today, November 1st 2019 in The Tax Procedures Code (Prescription of Goods for Affixation of Tax Stamps) Instrument, 2019 in line with the Tax Procedures Code Act, 2014 began implementing the Digital Tax Stamps solution.  

Excise duty laws dictate that all businesses dealing in excisable goods, are supposed to have their premises monitored 24/7, but with the number of factories in Uganda growing to over 5,000 and many producing night and day, it became impossible for URA to execute. That, then meant that government was relying on largely the manufacturers’ accuracy and truthfulness- the absence of which leads to severe tax leakages.

In simple terms, the stamps are indelible ink stamps to be affixed on beer, spirits, bottled water, soda, wines and tobacco products before the goods are released for sale onto the market. For the above products, that are locally manufactured, the stamp will be affixed on the on while on the production line and where the line is not automated, the stamps shall be fixed manually at the manufacturers’ premises.

For imported goods, stamps will be affixed at the point of entry or at a production facility in the country of origin. By the time the goods enter, the country we will already know the goods, the owners and how much tax is due. 

At its most basic, especially for the automated production lines, URA is able to know as the   production goes on, how many units are being produced or when production has been stopped. For anybody who has been falsifying production numbers; anybody who has been hiding any elements of production; they will find it difficult, because we will know the production before you even reach the monthly declaration because the digital tax stamps solution is connected to our servers that can be remotely monitored. 

Contrary to what is being claimed, Digital Tax Stamps are not a new tax, but rather in the words of Finance Minister, Hon Matia Kasaijja in 2017/18 Budget speech: “Tax stamps minimize under-declaration of such goods and boost tax collections.” The Hon Minister went to say: “Failure to affix tax stamps, the defacing of stamps, the possession of unstamped goods, or any attempt to acquire or sell stamps without authorization will lead to penalties as prescribed by law.”

Right from the time the announcement was made in the budget, URA started engaging all the would-be affected manufacturers as well as Uganda Manufacturers Association (UMA). A number of other engagements were also had with the Minister of Finance with the manufacturers.

Implementation of the solution was supposed to start in April this year but because the relevant legislation was not ready, the deadline was pushed to July 1st 2019, but again there were some glitches but finally, following the gazetting of the necessary laws in August 2019, on 1st September, we informed all the affected manufacturers and importers that we were ready to implement, come November 1st 2019.

But even then, we have extended to them an interim period between November 1st 2019 and February 1st 2020 to allow the manufacturers to have the solution installed at their premises, as well as to clear the unstamped stocks out of their warehouses and shelves. 

But as URA, we are disappointed that despite the fact that Digital Tax Stamps were announced over two years ago; despite the fact that we have engaged all the affected parties and regardless of the fact that because of the delays a number of manufacturers are trying to sabotage and blackmail government and or cause a crisis around it, either to delay or postpone the introduction of the solution.   

It is even more disappointing that some of the major players that are sabotaging implementation of this law do originate from and or operate in countries and markets where Digital Tax Stamps as a tax solution has been running for some time and these companies are complying in those countries. Why they think it is only in Uganda where they can reject Digital Tax Stamps, is anyone’s guess.

Yes we do understand that there shall be some costs of implementing the solution, but these costs pale in comparison to the anticipated broader gains.

In fact, the legitimate businesses operating in Uganda, especially those that have nothing to hide, there are all good reasons to welcome and support this solution because it bears immense medium to long term benefits to them.

For example, British American Tobacco (BAT) Uganda, last year, according to media reports said that an estimated 23% of the total cigarettes sold in Uganda were illicit, causing the business an estimated UGX30 billion in lost business.

A September 2016 report- compiled by Euromonitor Consulting for Nile Breweries, titled: Market Analysis For Illicit Alcohol In Uganda reported that counterfeiting (mainly industrial manufacturing by unregistered distillers) and smuggling combined accounted for 45.9% of the illicit alcohol market, worth USD310.1 million (UGX1.2 trillion) in value and USD92.7m (UGX361 billion) in tax losses.

According to the report, industrial manufacturing of low grade spirits represented the biggest chunk of the illicit category. Although most of the illicit was mostly packaged in sachets, a good amount was also packaged in glass and PET bottles with original branding or copycat branding of major local brands. Counterfeiting was prevalent in all segments of the market from premium and mid-priced international imported brands as well as mimicking of legally produced, local high quality brands as well as mid-market and budget, local branded alcohol. 

A similar study quoted by ABinBev in July 2019 states that in Uganda, 63.3% of the alcohol beverages market is dominated by illicit alcohol.

With Digital Tax Stamps we will be able to easily identify all these fake products from the market and using the new law which allows us to confiscate the unstamped products and prosecute everyone including the distributors and retailers, we will be able to remove as much illicit products from the market as possible. This is also important for the protection of our people who have no means of detecting illicit or dangerous alcohol.

Now that sachet alcohol has been banned, and with the digital tax stamps, it is possible to remove up to 50% of the illicit cigarettes and alcohol from the market. This will create new markets for the legitimate players worth UGX15 billion and UGX600 billion for cigarettes and alcohol respectively in value. This will earn government in excess of UGX180 billion in taxes!

That is what I call a win-win for all of us.    

The writer is Commissioner General, Uganda Revenue Authority (URA)

Continue Reading


EDITORIAL: Why Dfcu Bank’s UGX47 bn claim for Sudhir properties is wrong, legally, morally and an abuse of taxpayers’ trust in BoU

In 3 years alone, dfcu has earned in excess of UGX60 bn in profits from the Crane Bank deal. Add that to the UGX39 billion dfcu was aided to evade in interest on the deferred purchase price to the UGX37 billion profit dfcu stands to make, if BoU goes ahead to pay the UGX47 billion claim, dfcu Bank will have earned about UGX140 billion- that is all before they even complete the full UGX200bn purchase price for Crane Bank!



This Meera Investments owned building is part of the 48 properties that dfcu wrongfully transferred into their names without the consent of the owner. Following BoU's failure to annex the building from Meera Investments, dfcu has asked to return the buildings to BoU as per the sale agreement, but wants to be compensated UGX47 billion, yet it only paid UGX10 billion for the same.

It was recently reported in the media that following BoU’s failure to annex 48 properties belonging to Meera Investments Limited; properties it had wrongfully sold to dfcu and dfcu Bank had fraudulently gone ahead to transfer them into the bank’s names, dfcu had now decided to return the bank branches to Bank of Uganda.

That would have been the right thing to do in the first place, because dfcu should never have, knowingly purported to transfer the leases for the properties into its names without the consent of Meera Investments Limited, the lessor, but the fact that dfcu now wants to be paid UGX47 billion makes the whole move, all the more ugly.

According to information in the media dfcu, at acquisition stage, is said to have paid to BoU only UGX10 billion for the 48 properties, but on acquisition of the properties, had them revalued to UGX47 billion- the actual price they should have paid in the first place- because that is what PriceWaterhouseCoopers (PwC) had valued them at, before the takeover; however both BoU and dfcu conveniently forgot about this valuation at the sale stage.

Thank God, there are reports that now, the Governor, Bank of Uganda, Professor Tumusiime Mutebile has opposed the move to pay the UGX47 billion to dfcu Bank, saying it is undeserved.  Compensating dfcu this humongous amount of money, would make dfcu bank UGX37bn richer- never mind that they have been occupying the properties for nearly 3 years without paying rent.

This happening even before action is taken on the Public Accounts Committee on Commissions, State Authorities and State Enterprises (PAC – COSASE)  report on BoU’s mismanagement of the takeover of 7 defunct banks in which for example, it was found that Bank of Uganda did not value Crane Bank’s assets and liabilities as required by law and as such the purchase price of UGX200bn- payable over 30 months at no interest rate was unreasonable, is tantamount to abuse of justice especially for the owners of the closed banks. 

It shall be recalled that the Auditor General in his report to parliament had also found out that, as if intentionally undervaluing Crane Bank was not enough, Bank of Uganda went ahead to allow dfcu bank to pay the purchase price over a 30 months period without any interest, causing tax payers a loss of UGX39bn in lost interest.

Upon acquiring Crane Bank on the low, dfcu overnight increased their assets by 74% from UGX1.8 trillion to UGX3.1 trillion and profits by 134% from UGX45.3 billion in 2016 to UGX106.2 billion! As a result dfcu moved from being the 4th largest bank to the second largest overnight.

In fact if you add the profits associated with the Crane Bank acquisition earned by dfcu in year one alone, estimated to be at between UGX50 billion and UGX60 billion, to the UGX39 billion they should have paid to BoU as interest on the prolonged payment and now the UGX37 billion profit dfcu stands to make, if BoU went ahead to compensate them, dfcu will have earned about UGX140 billion. And that is before adding goodwill of the business they got as well as the UGX600 billion bad loan book that belonged to Crane Bank shareholders that BoU literary donated to dfcu- as it was never part of the purchase agreement.  

But that’s not all- there is an going case by Meera Investments in High Court Civil Court Suit No. 948 of 2017, in the Land Division- Meera Investments Ltd Vs dfcu Bank Limited and The Commissioner for Land Registration, challenging the transfer as an “illegality” and a “fraud.”  

Meera, wants vacant possession of the properties and a refund of “mesne profits” (profits of an estate received by a tenant in wrongful possession and recoverable by the landlord) with 20% interest, as well as damages and costs for the suit. 

Dfcu, attempting to reverse the possible fraud before court pronounces itself on the matter, is an attempt to subvert justice, especially to the aggrieved party.

Continue Reading




Now Trending

error: Content is protected !!