LEFT-RIGHT: Justices Kenneth Kakuru, Egonda-Ntende and Ezekiel Muhanguzi said the TAT Act requirement to pay 30% of a tax under objection before getting access to justice was inconsistent with Section 44 of the Constitution that guarantees access to justice as a non-derogable right.

The Constitutional Court has restricted the application of Section 15 of the Tax Appeals Tribunal Act, limiting its application to only cases where the tax dispute is about the amount of tax payable. In a majority 3 of 5 ruling, Justices Kenneth Kakuru, Egonda-Ntende and Ezekiel Muhanguzi ruled that, “Section 15 of the Tax Appeals Tribunal Act – in so far as it compels an objector to a tax assessment whose challenge is not with regard to the amount of tax payable, to pay to the tax authority 30% of the tax assessed – is inconsistent with Article 44 of…

This Is Premium Content. Subscribe And Save On Unlimited Access With Our Best Offers!

Tagged:
About the Author

Muhereza Kyamutetera is the Executive Editor of CEO East Africa Magazine. I am a travel enthusiast and the Experiences & Destinations Marketing Manager at EDXTravel. Extremely Ugandaholic. Ask me about #1000Reasons2ExploreUganda and how to Take Your Place In The African Sun.

beylikdüzü escort beylikdüzü escort